Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too

[Michael Crapse <michael () wi-fiber io>]

The lightbulb in this scenario has a severe security issue, and thus allows
total control of any windows computer on the network because it's set to a
private/trusted network. Also note, the lightbulb is publicly addressable
and has a 8MHz processor incapable of firewalling itself..

On 28 December 2017 at 20:41, Chuck Church <chuckchurch () gmail com> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Ricky Beam
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 9:55 PM
> To: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
> Cc: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org>
> Subject: Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too
>
> > Every scenario everyone has come up with is "unlikely". Home networks
> with multiple LANs??? Never going to happen; people don't know how to set
> them up, and there's little technical need for it.
>
> I couldn't agree more.  We're spending so much time with new RFCs to
> handle all these prefix delegation ways in order to accommodate 'power
> users' who are used to chaining one NATing IPv4 router off of another one
> and having it sort of work.  If we'd just put a stake in the ground and say
> residences can have one router and bridge everything below that we'd be
> further ahead.  I just can't see 99.999% of users being interested in
> subnetting their homes and writing firewall rules so their light bulbs
> can't talking to their DVRs.
>
> Chuck