nanog mailing list archives

Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention

From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:10:58 +0200



On 10/Jun/16 19:19, Hugo Slabbert wrote:

 

Unless it's mitigated by you accepting customer A's prefixes from any
transits you have,


This.

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Current thread:

Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention, (continued)
- - - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Leo Bicknell (Jun 10)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Joe Provo (Jun 11)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Hugo Slabbert (Jun 10)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
    - Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Randy Bush (Jun 10)