nanog mailing list archives
Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:47:53 -0400
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
One thing we do to reduce opportunistically hazardous vectors is to not learn customer paths via peers.
so I can't be a customer of you and a network you peer with? (I'm sure I got your meaning wrong)
Current thread:
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention, (continued)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 06)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) (Jun 08)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Joe Provo (Jun 08)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 08)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) (Jun 09)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Job Snijders (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Leo Bicknell (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 06)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Joe Provo (Jun 11)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Hugo Slabbert (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Randy Bush (Jun 10)