nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:13:41 +0900
I propose the following axiom: the greater the distance over which a packet is forwarded, the less likely it is to be an IPv6 packet.
that is a hypothesis not an axiom, especially without considerable measurement to back it up. but an interesting hypothesis. how do you propose to test it? randy
Current thread:
- IPv6 traffic percentages? nanog-isp (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jared Mauch (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? nanog-isp (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jared Mauch (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Owen DeLong (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Randy Bush (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Job Snijders (Jan 21)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? nanog-isp (Jan 20)
- Re: IPv6 traffic percentages? Jared Mauch (Jan 20)