nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:32:44 -0800
On Sunday, January 17, 2016, Dan Hollis <goemon () sasami anime net> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016, bzs () theworld com wrote:Sure, you have your hands on BGP etc, so what router commands (hammer) can effect international policy (nail)? This is fundamentally a social and political issue and needs to be dealt with on that level, not with changes in router configs.bgp blackhole fed by rbl? at the very least, scavenger queue packets by rbl.
If you are not already scoring packets by reputation, you are at very least behind what AWS is doing for volumetric ddos mitigation Check out around minute 12 and 13 http://youtu.be/Ys0gG1koqJA As stated earlier, ip packets are going the way of spam mail :( complacency / willful negligence needs to have a monetary cost.
-Dan
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Dan Hollis (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Doug Barton (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Dan Hollis (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 18)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Michael O'Connor (Jan 19)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 19)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Jan 20)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)