nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP choice
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:57:36 +0300
On 23 October 2015 at 11:54, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote: Hey,
Well, on the basis that an attack is made easier if you are running IS-IS on a vulnerable interface, in theory, an attack would be highly difficult if a vulnerable interface were not running IS-IS to begin with.
Assuming that interface won't punt ISIS if ISIS is not configured, unfortunately this assumption isn't true for all platforms. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: IGP choice, (continued)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice sthaug (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Baldur Norddahl (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Pablo Lucena (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice A . L . M . Buxey (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice thomas nanog (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Bill Blackford (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Saku Ytti (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Saku Ytti (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Matthew Petach (Oct 30)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 30)
- Re: IGP choice Randy Bush (Oct 24)