nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP choice
From: Daniel Corbe <dcorbe () hammerfiber com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:55:09 -0400
"marcel.duregards () yahoo fr" <marcel.duregards () yahoo fr> writes:
Hi everyone, Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ? IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what reason ? Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some international ISP/carriers design choice, please. Thank in advance, Best regards, -Marcel
I worked a project as recently as 2009 where we tried to connect two 6509s together over a tunnel interface and wanted to extend Area 0 across it and couldn't because it was a limitation of the version of IOS we were running at the time. That forced us to use isis. It was a decision based on pragmatism rather than design choice; and we were a small operator, too. The choice of an interior routing protocol really doesn't have much implication for small operators.
Current thread:
- Re: IGP choice, (continued)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Saku Ytti (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Saku Ytti (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Matthew Petach (Oct 30)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 30)
- Re: IGP choice Randy Bush (Oct 24)
- Message not available
- Re: IGP choice Randy Bush (Oct 26)