nanog mailing list archives
Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption
From: Matthew Newton <mcn4 () leicester ac uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 00:26:13 +0100
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:42:57PM +0000, Todd Underwood wrote:
it's just a new addressing protocol that happens to not work with the rest of the internet. it's unfortunate that we made that mistake, but i guess we're stuck with that now (i wish i could say something about lessons learned but i don't think any one of us has learned a lesson yet).
Would be really interesting to know how you would propose squeezing 128 bits of address data into a 32 bit field so that we could all continue to use IPv4 with more addresses than it's has available to save having to move to this new incompatible format. :-) Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4 () le ac uk> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp () le ac uk>
Current thread:
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption, (continued)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Curtis Maurand (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Mark Andrews (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Curtis Maurand (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Grzegorz Janoszka (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Owen DeLong (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Mark Andrews (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Todd Underwood (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Matthew Newton (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Todd Underwood (Oct 01)
- Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Mark Andrews (Oct 01)
- RE: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption Tony Wicks (Oct 01)