nanog mailing list archives
Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET
From: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:04:19 +0700
On 18 Mar 2015, at 17:00, Roland Dobbins wrote:
This is not an optimal approach, and most providers are unlikely to engage in such behavior due to its potential negative impact (I'm assuming you mean via S/RTBH and/or flowspec).
Here's one counterexample: <https://ripe68.ripe.net/presentations/176-RIPE68_JSnijders_DDoS_Damage_Control.pdf> ----------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Current thread:
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET, (continued)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Paul S. (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Paul S. (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Colin Johnston (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Colin Johnston (Mar 18)
- RE: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Eric Rogers (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Ray Soucy (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Colin Johnston (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Ca By (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Justin M. Streiner (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Ca By (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Paul S. (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Colin Johnston (Mar 18)