nanog mailing list archives
Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET
From: "Paul S." <contact () winterei se>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:31:52 +0900
All 6 of my upstreams (Most of them tier 1s, except Internap which is a tier 3?) have cooperated just fine in blocking problematic IPs if needed in emergencies.
I did not have to argue. On 3/18/2015 午後 02:26, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 18/Mar/15 04:13, Roland Dobbins wrote:Also, asking your upstreams/peers to block traffic sourced from this IP to your netblock(s) on their networks.I'm actually curious how many transit providers would implement data plane filters on their side to block source traffic bound for their downstreams.Personally, as a transit provider, I'm less inclined to filtering traffic in any way; impact to hardware e.t.c. notwithstanding...Perhaps times are changing. Mark.
Current thread:
- Getting hit hard by CHINANET Terrance Devor (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Christopher Morrow (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Paul S. (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Paul S. (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Colin Johnston (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Colin Johnston (Mar 18)
- RE: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Eric Rogers (Mar 18)