nanog mailing list archives

Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET


From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 07:55:31 -0700

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Justin M. Streiner <streiner () cluebyfour org
wrote:

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Ca By wrote:

 Having your upstream apply a permanent udp bw policer, say 5 or 10x busy
hour baseline, works well for this.


Many upstreams will not do that, particularly on a permanent basis.  They
might do something temporarily to deal with an incident, but many of the
bigger carriers probably wouldn't want to leave that in place permanently.

jms


Mine Tier 1 up-streams are fine with it permanent. YMMV.  I did have to get
my account team involved, but from a technical perspective, a one line
policer (all UDP rate-limit to 10% of link speed) is not a technical
challenge, and the one-off config element is not overly burdensome.

Again, YMMV.  And, your frequency and impact of IPv4 UDP based attacks will
dictate your needs.

CB


Current thread: