nanog mailing list archives
Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:43:03 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Ca By wrote:
Having your upstream apply a permanent udp bw policer, say 5 or 10x busy hour baseline, works well for this.
Many upstreams will not do that, particularly on a permanent basis. They might do something temporarily to deal with an incident, but many of the bigger carriers probably wouldn't want to leave that in place permanently.
jms
Current thread:
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET, (continued)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Mark Tinka (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Colin Johnston (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Colin Johnston (Mar 18)
- RE: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Eric Rogers (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Ray Soucy (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Colin Johnston (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Ca By (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Justin M. Streiner (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Ca By (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Paul S. (Mar 23)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Colin Johnston (Mar 18)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Mike Hale (Mar 17)
- Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET Roland Dobbins (Mar 18)