nanog mailing list archives
Re: optical gear cooling requirements
From: Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 14:51:01 -0500
Alex Rubenstein <alex () corp nac net> writes:
My question: have the optical folks woken up and made things cool front to back, or are they still in to the bottom to top world?
Unless something's changed, AT&T NEDS still reads "Systems exhausting more than 50 W/sq ft must exhaust the air vertically.". You can always put baffles above and beneath to channel the air into/from your hot/cold aisles. Makes it nice to be able to have the connectors on whichever side is convenient. -r
Current thread:
- optical gear cooling requirements Alex Rubenstein (Mar 03)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Rob Seastrom (Mar 03)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Christopher Morrow (Mar 03)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Edward Salonia (Mar 03)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Martin Hannigan (Mar 03)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Chris Adams (Mar 03)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Ricky Beam (Mar 04)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Jay Hennigan (Mar 04)
- RE: optical gear cooling requirements Naslund, Steve (Mar 04)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Nick Hilliard (Mar 04)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Matthew Crocker (Mar 04)
- RE: optical gear cooling requirements Alex Rubenstein (Mar 05)
- Re: optical gear cooling requirements Rob Seastrom (Mar 03)