nanog mailing list archives

Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network setup?


From: Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 23:50:10 -0400

My equipment that can't do 5.4 with the latest stable or beta firmware says
you can't. Hopefully we get 5.1 "soon". :)

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 19, 2015 11:36 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" <faisal () snappytelecom net> wrote:

FCC Cert claims different.

:)

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: Support () Snappytelecom net

------------------------------

*From: *"Josh Luthman" <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
*To: *"Faisal Imtiaz" <faisal () snappytelecom net>
*Cc: *"NANOG list" <nanog () nanog org>, "Ray Soucy" <rps () maine edu>
*Sent: *Friday, June 19, 2015 9:16:37 PM
*Subject: *Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network
setup?

Uhm he's not wrong...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 19, 2015 9:13 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" <faisal () snappytelecom net> wrote:

The thing you need to watch out for with Ubiquiti is that they don't
support DFS, so the entire U-NII-2 channel space is off limits for 5 GHz.

Huh ????

Please verify your facts before making blanket statements which are not
accurate ...



Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Soucy" <rps () maine edu>
To: "Sina Owolabi" <notify.sina () gmail com>
Cc: "nanog () nanog org list" <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 7:07:01 PM
Subject: Re: Whats' a good product for a high-density Wireless network
setup?

I know you don't want to hear this answer because of cost but I've had
good
luck with Cisco for very high density (about 1,000 clients in a packed
auditorium actively using the network as they follow along with the
presenter).

The thing you need to watch out for with Ubiquiti is that they don't
support DFS, so the entire U-NII-2 channel space is off limits for 5
GHz.
That's pretty significant because you're limited to 9 x 20 MHz channels
or
4 x 40 MHz channels.  Keeping the power level down and creating small
cells
is essential for high density, so with less channels your hands are
really
tied in that case.  Also, avoid the Zero Handoff marketing nonsense they
advertise; I'm sure it can work great for a low client residential area
but
it requires all APs to share a single channel and depends upon
coordinating
only one active transmitter at a time, so it simply won't scale.

I don't have experience with other vendors at large scale or high
density.

I don't think what you're talking about is really high density anymore
though.  That's just normal coverage.  Wireless is a lot more
complicated
than selecting a vendor, though.  If you know what you're doing even
Ubiquiti could work decently, but if you don't even a Cisco solution
won't
save you.  You really need to be on top of surveying correctly and
having
appropriate AP placement and channel distribution.





On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Sina Owolabi <notify.sina () gmail com>
wrote:

Hi

We are profiling equipment and design for an expected high user
density
network of multiple, close nit, residential/hostel units. Its going
to be
8-10 buildings with possibly a over 1000 users at any given time.
We are looking at Ruckus and Ubiquiti as options to get over the high
number of devices we are definitely going to encounter.

How did you do it, and what would you advise for product and layout?

Thanks in advance!




--
Ray Patrick Soucy
Network Engineer
University of Maine System

T: 207-561-3526
F: 207-561-3531

MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network
www.maineren.net






Current thread: