nanog mailing list archives
Re: Working with Spamhaus
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:23:07 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 <m3aawg technical committee co-chair hat> I agree with Suresh here -- NANOG used to almost be somewhat hostile to anyone who started discussions regarding anti-abuse and/or security issues which didn't involve routing backbone engineers. A lot of us old-timers took the hint and basically started lurking, not participating in meetings, or simply checked out of NANOG altogether . A lot of time has passed sine those days, so perhaps attitudes have changed a bit with regards to operational anti-abuse issues? - - ferg </m3aawg technical committee co-chair hat> On 7/29/2015 10:14 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
<delurk> They come to M3AAWG on a regular basis and there’s the M3AAWG hosting SIG that you might want to participate in. NANOG doesn’t always have a mail abuse (and not very many network abuse) session on the agenda, plus just how many people doing routing or DNS seem to even care what their colleagues down the hall in the abuse team are doing or which conferences they attend? I remember a time (under the previous list management) when discussing spam here was deemed OT and non operational - off list warnings, suspensions and such. Ancient history I guess, but still .. </delurk> —srsOn 29-Jul-2015, at 10:06 AM, Bob Evans <bob () FiberInternetCenter com> wrote: Would be nice to have an RBL service that attended NANOG meetings. Would make for a more trusted RBL we can tell customers to make use. Spamhaus ever attend a NANOG meetings ? Thank You Bob Evans CTO
- -- Paul Ferguson PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlW5C/oACgkQKJasdVTchbJ3OwD9FhTx7QQ42UGIAjd6e9ajhQ2U Z0I8gOqO32xZACwVaEYBAJwZujweC+fiSk4uSEtgDkIXpbQFWSfvkjpzB96fkI4y =4qS3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: Working with Spamhaus, (continued)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Bryan Tong (Jul 28)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus William Herrin (Jul 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Larry Sheldon (Jul 28)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Bryan Tong (Jul 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Larry Sheldon (Jul 28)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Matt Palmer (Jul 28)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Bryan Tong (Jul 28)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Matt Palmer (Jul 28)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Bob Evans (Jul 29)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 29)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Paul Ferguson (Jul 29)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Paul Ferguson (Jul 29)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Bob Evans (Jul 29)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 29)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Jon Lewis (Jul 29)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Bryan Tong (Jul 28)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Jon Lewis (Jul 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Larry Sheldon (Jul 28)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Larry Sheldon (Jul 28)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus Bryan Tong (Jul 28)
- Re: Working with Spamhaus goemon (Jul 28)