nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Damian Menscher via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 22:17:23 -0800
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:
Thanks for the reminder to look at it from multiple perspectives.
The key attribute missing from the discussion so far is that the factors be *different*, from the set of: - something you know (password / PIN) - something you have (keyfob / OTP generator / chip) - something you are (fingerprint / retina scan) Claiming a passphrase and key are two "factors" is missing the point -- they both come from the same set (a secret which could be cloned). If you believe those are two factors then a password alone is 10 factors (one for each character)! ;) Damian
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Christopher Morrow (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Matthew Petach (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Damian Menscher via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake James Downs (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Jared Mauch (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Joel Jaeggli (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Max Tulyev (Dec 25)
- RE: Broadband Router Comparisons Keith Medcalf (Dec 24)