nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 05:14:14 +0900
'cyber security' really isn't a whole lot different from 'lock your damned doors and windows' brick/mortar security.
hellofalot more holes to cover. and the salaries of the guards are a bit higher for the net; so more incentive for pointy heads to skimp. randy
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Christopher Morrow (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Christopher Morrow (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Christopher Morrow (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Matthew Petach (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Damian Menscher via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake James Downs (Dec 27)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Jared Mauch (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 26)