nanog mailing list archives
Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 22:00:41 +0100
On 18/08/2015 21:56, Gert Doering wrote:
So how's that stopping one of your bilateral peers from sending you traffic destined elsewhere?
it doesn't: you detect it and depeer them. If they force the situation with static routes, the traffic will be dropped. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits, (continued)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Fwd: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Nick Hilliard (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Nick Hilliard (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits William Herrin (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Nick Hilliard (Aug 19)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Pshem Kowalczyk (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits John Osmon (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)