Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits

[Tim Durack <tdurack () gmail com>]

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Gert Doering <gert () greenie muc de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:32:53AM -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
> > > (It would be cool if Cisco would understand that hardware forwarding
> > > platforms need useful netflow with MAC-addresses in there...  ASR9k at
> [..]
> > At the risk of introducing religion, I will mention sFlow...
>
> Yes... and this is helping exactly why...?  Given the overwhelming
> support for sFlow in (Cisco-) hardware routers used as peering edge?  :-)


I ask Cisco for sFlow support on a regular basis. Cisco typically respond
with some variation of NIH syndrome. Anyway, back to my question :-)

-- 
Tim:>