nanog mailing list archives
Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits
From: Tim Durack <tdurack () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:32:53 -0400
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Gert Doering <gert () greenie muc de> wrote:
Hi, (It would be cool if Cisco would understand that hardware forwarding platforms need useful netflow with MAC-addresses in there... ASR9k at least got working MAC-accounting, but more fine grained telemetry would certainly be appreciated. Software IOS can do it, Sup720 cannot do it due to hardware constraints, Sup2T exports MAC addresses taken from random caches in the system but not the inbound packets, XR doesn't do it at all, hrmph)
At the risk of introducing religion, I will mention sFlow... -- Tim:>
Current thread:
- Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Jared Mauch (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits manning (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Jared Mauch (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Fwd: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Tim Durack (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Nick Hilliard (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits Nick Hilliard (Aug 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] Peering + Transit Circuits William Herrin (Aug 18)