nanog mailing list archives
Re: upstream support for flowspec
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:12:15 -0400
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Daniel Corbe <corbe () corbe net> wrote:
And once that happens, what are the chances of services providers adopting this for their customers to make use of on as wide of a scale as (for example) blackhole community strings. I'd certainly *love* to have a way to mitigate an attack that doesn't involve me sacrificing one service on my network to save the rest.
there are providers (verizon business, att, sprint, ntt at least) that provide mitigation via bgp update... which is equivalent to the blackhole community stuff, why not investigate those options? (or if you had, what was lacking?)
Current thread:
- upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec John Kristoff (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec joel jaeggli (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Saku Ytti (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Job Snijders (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Job Snijders (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec joel jaeggli (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec John Kristoff (Sep 18)