nanog mailing list archives
upstream support for flowspec
From: Daniel Corbe <corbe () corbe net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:53:52 -0400
I was perusing RFC5575 after reading a presentation that ALU did (presumably during some previous NANOG conference). Reference: https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/wed.general.trafficdiversion.serodio.10.pdf This seems like it would be a godsend for small operators like myself who don't have access to unlimited bandwidth and are put off by off-site scrubbing services. As far as I can tell though the only platforms that offer support are the 7750-SR and platforms made by Juniper. Is there anything in the air about widening the adoption base? Cisco? Brocade? And once that happens, what are the chances of services providers adopting this for their customers to make use of on as wide of a scale as (for example) blackhole community strings. I'd certainly *love* to have a way to mitigate an attack that doesn't involve me sacrificing one service on my network to save the rest. Best, Daniel
Current thread:
- upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec John Kristoff (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec joel jaeggli (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Saku Ytti (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Job Snijders (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Job Snijders (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec joel jaeggli (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec John Kristoff (Sep 18)