nanog mailing list archives

Re: ARIN / RIR Pragmatism (WAS: Re: RADB)


From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 11:40:59 +0000

On Oct 26, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

20% coverage in lacnic low?  how do ipv6 and dnssec compare (which is
damned sad)?  over 2,000 in ripe and over 8%?  how does that compare to
ipv6?  

arin, 388 and 0.7%, a joke.

LACNIC numbers (as a percent) are quite good, but my question 
was why only RIPE has the very impressive total count of ROAs.
You can clearly point to ARIN's legal treatment of the risks involved, 
but that is not applicable in the APNIC case....

You don't feel there's any correlation between RIPE's IRR approach 
and their RPKI success?   

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN


Current thread: