Re: ARIN / RIR Pragmatism (WAS: Re: RADB)

[Dmitry Burkov <dburk () burkov aha ru>]

John 
- it is not about RPK
I - our initial goal was to deploy some kind of certification to resources allocated to our members

Dmitry

If we use for it some SIDR developments - may be - it is a mistake or misentrepration - but what's true that we never 
thougy
On 26 Oct 2014, at 14:40, John Curran <jcurran () arin net> wrote:

> On Oct 26, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
> > 20% coverage in lacnic low?  how do ipv6 and dnssec compare (which is
> > damned sad)?  over 2,000 in ripe and over 8%?  how does that compare to
> > ipv6?  
> >
> > arin, 388 and 0.7%, a joke.
>
> LACNIC numbers (as a percent) are quite good, but my question 
> was why only RIPE has the very impressive total count of ROAs.
> You can clearly point to ARIN's legal treatment of the risks involved, 
> but that is not applicable in the APNIC case....
>
> You don't feel there's any correlation between RIPE's IRR approach 
> and their RPKI success?   
>
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN