nanog mailing list archives
Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules
From: Jérôme Nicolle <jerome () ceriz fr>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:56:45 +0100
Le 17/11/2014 21:09, ryanL a écrit :
kinda wish they had a similar undocumented command.
Well, there is a command, and you can automate it's application. See https://gist.github.com/agh/932bbd1f74d312573925 . Can't tell if DOM is supported on 3rd party. -- Jérôme Nicolle +33 6 19 31 27 14
Current thread:
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules, (continued)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 17)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Justin M. Streiner (Nov 17)
- RE: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Jethro R Binks (Nov 17)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules William Herrin (Nov 17)
- RE: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Darden, Patrick (Nov 17)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Scott Voll (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Clayton Zekelman (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- RE: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Naslund, Steve (Nov 17)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules ryanL (Nov 17)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Ken Matlock (Nov 17)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Jérôme Nicolle (Nov 17)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Naslund, Steve (Nov 17)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 17)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Jérôme Nicolle (Nov 17)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Ryan Pugatch (Nov 18)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Baldur Norddahl (Nov 18)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Naslund, Steve (Nov 18)
- Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules Richard Hesse (Nov 25)