nanog mailing list archives
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
From: Robert Drake <rdrake () direcpath com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:58:11 -0400
On 7/29/2014 6:42 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
The timestamp is a natural index. You shouldn't need to run a distributed query for finding information about a specific incident. You would have to write your own custom tools to access and manage the db, so that's just impractical. The timestamp as well as most of the other fields should be fairly easily compressible since most of the bits are the same. You might as well use a regular plaintext logfile and gzip it.Of course, getting anything back*out* of that again in any sort of reasonable timeframe would be... optimistic. I suppose if you're storing it all in hadoop you can map/reduce your way out of trouble, but that's going to mean a lot of equipment sitting around doing nothing for 99.99% of the time. Perhaps mine litecoin between searches?
Current thread:
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT, (continued)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT William Herrin (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Robert Drake (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Simon Perreault (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Lee Howard (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- RE: Carrier Grade NAT Tony Wicks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Lee Howard (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Robert Drake (Jul 29)
- RE: Carrier Grade NAT Tony Wicks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Julien Goodwin (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Corey Touchet (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Chris Adams (Jul 30)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Doug Barton (Jul 30)