nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamassassin
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:20:37 +0800
as i said, much of the crap coming through, 10-20 times normal, does not have dkim. i suggest that focusing on dkim is a red herring. and yes, i know how dkim works.
If that is the case, there must be someway to configure to reject if the dkim signature is invalid.
5.0-0.8 is a large valus, at least in this area.
You could always block their ip in the ...
their? you are presuming a single soure.
You could also add a rbl query to your mail server config to spamhaus.
have had that for years randy
Current thread:
- spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Message not available
- Re: spamassassin Larry Sheldon (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Daniel Staal (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Simon Perreault (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Gary E. Miller (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Michael Butler (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Daniel Staal (Feb 20)
- Re: spamassassin Daniel Staal (Feb 20)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 20)