nanog mailing list archives
Re: spamassassin
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:10:59 -0600
On 2/18/2014 8:42 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
They are smart and dkim sign their messages; even though it's invalid I believe that's why it has such a low bayes score.lots of the spam getting through has no dkimIt's getting marked as ham and not spam. Are you positive your definitions are still updating?sa-update has run. and it runs cleanly randy
From a posting on NANAE:
On 2/18/2014 6:09 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:Received: from [207.254.213.223] (helo=drone166.ral.icpbounce.com)Larry, icpbounce.com is IContact aka Vocus. I don't know whether the managers of Vocus are as whitehat as those of IContact were before the buyout, but Andrew Barrett was still in charge of abuse/deliverability when I last checked and he *does* respond quickly and effectively to spam complaints. Try sending this to abuse () icontact com.
-- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
Current thread:
- spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Message not available
- Re: spamassassin Larry Sheldon (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Michael Thomas (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Private Sender (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Daniel Staal (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: spamassassin Simon Perreault (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: spamassassin Gary E. Miller (Feb 19)