Re: spamassassin

[Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>]

I would not advise that.  Plenty of things can render a dkim sig invalid.
 Not all of them are evidences of malice.

You might be well advised to check for a DMARC record (which asserts policy
using a combination of DKIM and SPF) and if there's a reject there, feel
free to trash the email if there's a validation failure.  But not simply
because a DKIM signature breaks.

--srs

On Tuesday, February 18, 2014, Private Sender <nobody () snovc com> wrote:

> Spamassassin knows the dkim signature is invalid, so there must be a dns
> query that occurs at this point in the message processing.
>
> If that is the case, there must be someway to configure to reject if the
> dkim signature is invalid.

-- 
--srs (iPad)