nanog mailing list archives
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:08:43 +0100 (CET)
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Saturday, February 08, 2014 06:38:29 AM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:That's one way of doing it, or you give it an IA_NA as well if you want a WAN address.We prefer DHCP_IA_NA to ND/RA.
I have never heard anyone refer to SLAAC as IA_NA. I meant the DHCP kind. When saying IA_NA and IA_PD, you should take for granted people mean DHCP. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems, (continued)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jay Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 08)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 11)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 11)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Anders Löwinger (Feb 13)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 13)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 07)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 07)