nanog mailing list archives

RE: SIP on FTTH systems


From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:47:35 -0600

In the scenario you're describing does each PC get its own /64 (or /56 or
/48) directly from the service provider?  Or are they in the same netblock?

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Anders Löwinger [mailto:anders () abundo se] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 6:33 PM
To: Mikael Abrahamsson
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: SIP on FTTH systems

On 2014-02-11 23:41, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Is there not an issue with this if the customer is connected directly to
the
access device over L2? They will not communicate with each other direcly,
all traffic will be exchanged through the default gateway?

Yes, what's the problem with that?

Bad description by me. I'll try again.

If I have two PCs in my home, connected with GE to a L2 switch and I buy 10 
Mbit Internet access, I don't want traffic between my two PCs to be
exchanged 
through the default route.

They could possible communicate directly using link-local, but I'm not sure 
how they would find each other?

Default gw could send a redirect...

I'd venture to say that any IPv6 implementation that doesn't support this
is
broken and should be fixed by the implementor.

Agree.

/Anders






Current thread: