nanog mailing list archives
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:57:20 +0200
On Thursday, February 06, 2014 11:56:45 AM cdel.firsthand.net wrote:
Time for users to consider splitting L2 services from IP ?
But consumer broadband is all about IP; the Layer 2 is needed to transport that IP, and that's a network problem, not a user one. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- SIP on FTTH systems Jean-Francois Mezei (Feb 05)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 05)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jean-Francois Mezei (Feb 05)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Måns Nilsson (Feb 05)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems cdel.firsthand.net (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Jean-Francois Mezei (Feb 06)
- Re: SIP on FTTH systems Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 06)
- RE: SIP on FTTH systems Frank Bulk (Feb 05)