nanog mailing list archives
Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls
From: Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:59:04 -0700
On 04/18/2014 12:57 AM, Enno Rey wrote:
I fully second Sander's input. I've been involved in IPv6 planning in a number of very large enterprises now and_none_ of them required/asked for (66/overloading) NAT for their firewall environments. A few think about very specific deployments of NPTv6 like stuff for connections to supplier/partner networks (to map those to their own address space) but these are corner cases not even relevant for their "firewalls".
How many of those networks were implementing with IPv6 PI space? My experience has been that those customers are not interested in IPv6 NAT, but instead utilize network segmentation to define "internal" vs. "external."
OTOH, customers for whom PI space is not realistic (for whatever reasons, and yes there are reasons) are very interested in the combination of ULA + NTPv6 to handle internal resources without having to worry about renumbering down the road.
Doug
Current thread:
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls, (continued)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Brandon Ross (Apr 17)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Matthew Kaufman (Apr 17)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Matt Palmer (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Seth Mos (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Enno Rey (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Nick Hilliard (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Lee Howard (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Fernando Gont (Apr 21)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Brandon Ross (Apr 21)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Enno Rey (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Doug Barton (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Enno Rey (Apr 18)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls Doug Barton (Apr 19)
- Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls William Herrin (Apr 18)