nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS Reliability
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:00:54 -0400
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:26 PM, George William Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com> wrote:
The other subthread about routeability plays into that. For BIGPLACE environments, you should be considering how many AS numbers independently host DNS instances for you, in how many geographical regions, and do you have a backup registrar available spun up...
here's an interesting point... if you are a BIGPLACE, do you want to trust your fate to some third party hosting your dns for you? What about how your internal name service stuff is managed? say you have a practice of using rsh to affect updates across your 4 main dns nodes, adding a 5th or Nth outside where rsh is not possible/desired .... means adding additional processes and cruft to your update process, is this acceptable? Take, for instance the FBI.gov domain 3 days ago, some set of updates happened, their ipv4 servers were answering with a consistent response, their ipv6 nodes were answering with a variety of not correct answers :( In the case of the FBI.gov domain, all of it is handled outside 'fbi.gov hands' (all servers hosted externally) but... -chris
Current thread:
- Re: DNS Reliability, (continued)
- Re: DNS Reliability bmanning (Sep 23)
- Re: DNS Reliability Rubens Kuhl (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Phil Fagan (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Eric Brunner-Williams (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability George William Herbert (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability George Michaelson (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability George William Herbert (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability George Michaelson (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability George William Herbert (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Christopher Morrow (Sep 12)
- Re: DNS Reliability Sebastian Castro (Sep 16)