nanog mailing list archives

Re: DNS Reliability


From: George William Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:26:43 -0700



On Sep 12, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

Everything else remaining equal...is there a standard or expectation for
DNS reliability?
...
Measured in queries completed vs. queries lost.

this is the wrong question.  the protocol is designed assuming query
failures.

randy

I think it's part of the right answer.  Capacity and server connectivity issues, what this metric will mostly measure, 
do matter.

The other part, more likely to get you on CNN and Reddit and the front pages of the NY Times and WSJ, is the area 
represented by MTBF / MTTR / etc.  how often is DNS for your domain DOWN - or WRONG - and how fast did you recover.

The other subthread about routeability plays into that.  For BIGPLACE environments, you should be considering how many 
AS numbers independently host DNS instances for you, in how many geographical regions, and do you have a backup 
registrar available spun up...


-george william herbert


Sent from Kangphone

Current thread: