nanog mailing list archives
Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:44:50 -0700
On Mar 15, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Patrick <nanog () haller ws> wrote:
On 2013-03-15 12:33, . wrote:Similary, maybe you need exploitability to have a internet.Exploitability = usability from a different perspective. Postel said "be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept", which seems like usability restated, and would QED this.
Actually, it was "be conservative in what you send, liberal in what you accept." Small nit, but does change the meaning a bit in this context. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work, (continued)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Eugen Leitl (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Patrick (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Reply-To: Patrick (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jimmy Hess (Mar 18)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 18)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work David Walker (Mar 18)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Eugen Leitl (Mar 19)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Dobbins, Roland (Mar 19)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Eugeniu Patrascu (Mar 17)