nanog mailing list archives

Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work


From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:11:24 -0400 (EDT)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jimmy Hess" <mysidia () gmail com>

On 3/18/13, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:
[snip]
In the next 3 years, it will become possible to build an
autonomously
navigating aircraft that can a) cross the Atlantic and b) carry a
nuclear weapon.

Not only is it already possible to build a human manually navigated
aircraft that can do both (a), and (b), they already exist, and computer
autonomy isn't necessary or useful, to hit a single big target; now
computer autonomous aircraft that can do only (a) could be just as
useful as decoys.

Sure it is.  An autonomous UPV *is small enough to bust the ADIZ without
returning a skin paint*.

Nuclear weapons are rare, expensive, and the existing ones are
(hopefully) well-secured, due to their extremely high value. I
would be more concerned about the possibility of a large swarm -- of
half a million solar powered drones of the approximate size of a
large eagle capable of crossing the oceans and releasing a spray of
bio agents over very large distances.

Whichever weapon is chosen, the point remains that the battlefield
is asymmetric, and it's asymmetric *against us*.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647 1274


Current thread: