nanog mailing list archives
Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl org>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:02:29 +0100
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 08:39:20PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
Having said that, we probably *will* see a number of incidents where the biohazard cleanup crews have to clean up a local mess...
The DIYbio community is perfectly harmless so far. The feds are already breathing down their necks, so there's no really no point in adding gratuitious gasoline to the fire.
Current thread:
- WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Miles Fidelman (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jay Ashworth (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Eugen Leitl (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Miles Fidelman (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 14)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Patrick (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Owen DeLong (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Reply-To: Patrick (Mar 15)
- Re: WW: Bruce Schneier on why security can't work Jimmy Hess (Mar 18)