nanog mailing list archives

Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?


From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 14:42:48 -0500

Because telcos specifically want to /discourage/ competition.

You're perilously close to trolling, here, sir...
-jra

Jean-Francois Mezei <jfmezei_nanog () vaxination ca> wrote:

On 13-02-02 10:36, Jay Ashworth wrote:

Yes, but everyone on a splitter must be backhauled to the same L1
provider,
and putting splitters *in the outside plant* precludes any other type
of L1 service, *ever*.  So that's a non-starter.


If you have 4 ISPs, why not put 4 splitters in the neighbourhood ?
Individual homes can be hooked to any one of the 4 splitters, and you
then only need 4 strands between splitter and CO.

I understand that having strands from CO to Homes is superior at the
technical point of veiw and gives you more flexibility for different
services (including commercial services to a home while the neighbour
gets residential services).

But if strands from CO to homes is so superior, how come telcos aren't
doing it and are using GPON instead ?

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


Current thread: