Re: BGP from Juniper to Cisco ASR

[Philip Lavine <source_route () yahoo com>]

I was able to solve the issue by statically routing the connected /29 out the connected interface, that way it overrode 
the BGP learned route for the same subnet (unfortunately this might have been a multi-homing issue that resulted in 
asymmetrical routing to the primary peer via the secondary peer, since the secondary peer session was already 
established). I thought BGP was "intelligent" enough to run the TCP session over the directly connected interfaces on 
the same subnets. I can understand this being an issue with multihop but not multi-homing.



On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:01 PM, Rakesh M <raaki.88 () gmail com> wrote:
  
Whats the frequency of this message occurence ?




On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Eric A Louie <elouie () yahoo com> wrote:

When I had that problem, it was because the max-prefixes on the Juniper router was being triggered.   If I remember 
correctly.  It's a strange return message for the wrong issue.
> > ________________________________
> > From: Philip Lavine <source_route () yahoo com>
> > To: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:48 AM
> > Subject: BGP from Juniper to Cisco ASR
>
> > Dec 18 07:46:33: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor <REMOTE PEER> active 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
> > Dec 18 15:46:33.615: BGP: ses global <REMOTE PEER> (0x7FB1CD209CF0:0) act Receive NOTIFICATION 2/5 (authentication 
> > failure) 0 bytes
> >
> > Although I have seem this on the message boards I am little confused in that the ISP is telling me that there is no 
> > authentication enabled on the Juniper and I do not have authentication enabled on the ASR. So what is going on here?