nanog mailing list archives
Re: Comcast contact
From: Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 23:55:38 -0400
"Shaw, Matthew" <mshaw () fairpoint com> writes:
Make sure the remote phone is using a low bandwidth codec too. In a previous life changing a remote (home) user's phone from G.711 to G.729 made all the difference in the world to their call quality.
i think you've got that backwards. 80 kbit/sec on the wire is not a lot these days, and in a world where we're conditioned to accept gsm or worse, un-transcoded g.711u sounds startlingly good. if you're so short on bandwidth that moving to a 24 kbit/sec on the wire codec makes a difference, you're on the ragged edge of being hosed. -r
Current thread:
- Comcast contact Andy Ringsmuth (Aug 06)
- Re: Comcast contact Brandon Galbraith (Aug 06)
- RE: Comcast contact Shaw, Matthew (Aug 06)
- Re: Comcast contact Rob Seastrom (Aug 06)
- RE: Comcast contact Shaw, Matthew (Aug 07)
- RE: Comcast contact Shaw, Matthew (Aug 06)
- Re: Comcast contact Brandon Galbraith (Aug 06)
- Re: Comcast contact Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 06)
- Re: Comcast contact James M Keller (Aug 06)
- Re: Comcast contact Livingood, Jason (Aug 07)
- Re: Comcast contact Ray Wong (Aug 07)
- Re: Comcast contact Livingood, Jason (Aug 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comcast contact Chad Reid (Aug 07)