nanog mailing list archives
Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:15:36 +0000
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:10:32PM -0400, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013, Clayton Zekelman wrote:Just wondering aloud if an ISP that did have commercial interest could run a non-member driven exchange point successfully as long as they had pricing and policies that were similar to member driven exchange points.Verrrry interesting that you raise that. IIRC, Albuquerque has NMIX which I think was setup as for-profit. (John Brown are you still here?) Well over a decade ago now, my recollection is fuzzy. I don't recall the reasoning in choosing for-profit over nont-for-profit.
[NMIX couldn't pay its bills so it lost a lot of support/clients] /bill
wfms
Current thread:
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet, (continued)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet William F. Maton Sotomayor (Aug 21)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet Clayton Zekelman (Aug 21)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet Bill Woodcock (Aug 21)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet Niels Bakker (Aug 23)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet Jay Hanke (Aug 23)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet Jay Ashworth (Aug 21)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet William F. Maton Sotomayor (Aug 21)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet Clayton Zekelman (Aug 21)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet William F. Maton Sotomayor (Aug 21)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet John Osmon (Aug 21)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet bmanning (Aug 21)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet William F. Maton Sotomayor (Aug 21)
- Re: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet Christopher Morrell (Aug 21)
- RE: Vancouver IXP - VanTX - BCNet Jacques Latour (Aug 21)