nanog mailing list archives

Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking


From: Alexander Neilson <alexander () neilson net nz>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:55:11 +1200


Regards
Alexander

Alexander Neilson
Neilson Productions Limited

alexander () neilson net nz
021 329 681
022 456 2326

On 8/08/2013, at 9:47 AM, Marsh Ray <maray () microsoft com> wrote:

From: Christopher Morrow
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 2:06 PM

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Marsh Ray <maray () microsoft com> wrote:

It would be incredibly useful for someone to start a page or a category on
Wikipedia "List of Internet Routing and DNS Incidents" that would include
both "accidental" and malicious events.

I would see there being a problem with Wikipedia trying to categorise some of them as accidental / malicious. I think 
if it was done it would have to be list where ones that were publicly announced as accidental would be listed as 
accidents and the rest left un noted to comply with neutral point of view and verification.


do we really need that?

Have you ever heard of someone using IP addresses as an access control mechanism? (AKA, "IP whitelist")

When I hear about this, I would really *love* to be able to link them to a credible source.

they seem to occur often enough that that isn't really required :(

*I* believe you, but in practice that's not sufficient to convince many other folks.
Currently, a section of a page on Wikipedia lists 7 incidents going back to 1997.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_hijacking#Public_incidents

Serious question: Do folks here feel that is an accurate representation of this phenomenon in practice?

I would tend to say as it lists BGPmon.net as an external link thats a good resource for finding out about other ones 
that have happened. Also maybe that section should be renamed notable incidents and just have it as a sample of some of 
these incidents.


- Marsh



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description:


Current thread: