nanog mailing list archives
Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 02:03:45 -0700
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote:
On (2013-08-07 11:20 +0300), Martin T wrote:on Internet? Has there been such situations in history? Isn't there a method against such hijacking? Or have I misunderstood something and this isn't possible?Certainly practical scenario, but in many cases not needed at all. In most cases upstream does not do any automatic prefix filter generation, it's maybe somewhat popular in mid-sized european shops but generally not too common. There is active on-going work to secure BGP and you may want to read up on 'RPKI' which is further along that track.
I hope it has better adoption than BCP38/BCP84. :-) - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
Current thread:
- RE: questions regarding prefix hijacking, (continued)
- RE: questions regarding prefix hijacking Marsh Ray (Aug 07)
- Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking Alexander Neilson (Aug 07)
- Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking Mark Andrews (Aug 07)
- Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Aug 08)
- Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking Martin T (Aug 08)
- Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking Saku Ytti (Aug 08)
- Message not available
- Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking Larry Sheldon (Aug 07)
- RE: questions regarding prefix hijacking Ahad Aboss (Aug 07)
- Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking Indra Pramana (Aug 07)
- Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking Paul Ferguson (Aug 07)
- Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking Mark Andrews (Aug 07)