nanog mailing list archives

Re: questions regarding prefix hijacking


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 03:07:04 -0700

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Martin T <m4rtntns () gmail com> wrote:

Ok. And such attacks have happened in the past? For example one could
do a pretty widespread damage for at least short period of time if it
announces for example some of the root DNS server prefixes(as long
prefixes as possible) to it's upstream provider and as upstream
provider probably prefers client traffic over it's peerings or
upstreams, it will prefer those routes by malicious ISP for all the
traffic to root DNS servers?



Historically, most prefix hijacks have been accidental, generally due
to configuration error -- for instance:

http://www.renesys.com/2008/02/pakistan-hijacks-youtube-1/

Having said that, there are quite a few documented cases of it being
done intentionally, and for nefarious purposes.

- ferg



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com


Current thread: