nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 address length technical design
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:17:11 -0400
Chris Campbell <chris () ctcampbell com> writes:
Is anyone aware of any historical documentation relating to the choice of 32 bits for an IPv4 address? Cheers.
8 bit host identifiers had proven to be too short... :) -r
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Cutler James R (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Cutler James R (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Tony Finch (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Owen DeLong (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Cutler James R (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Michael Thomas (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design David Miller (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Tony Finch (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 05)