nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 address length technical design
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 18:53:57 +0100
On 6 Oct 2012, at 02:11, Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:
Wasn't David Cheriton proposing something like this? http://www-dsg.stanford.edu/triad/
CCNx basically routes on URLs http://conferences.sigcomm.org/co-next/2009/papers/Jacobson.pdf Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Cutler James R (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Robert E. Seastrom (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Bjorn Leffler (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Scott Weeks (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Johnny Eriksson (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Michael Thomas (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design David Miller (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Tony Finch (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 06)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 06)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 06)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Cutler James R (Oct 06)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Steven Noble (Oct 07)
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design Paul Vinciguerra (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Michael Thomas (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 07)