nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 10:43:46 -0700
On May 29, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Alex Band wrote:
RPKI needs the full data set to determine if a BGP prefix has the status 'valid', 'invalid' or 'unknown'. It can't work with partial data.
I think I now understand concerns about scaling... :-) Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns?, (continued)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? paul vixie (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Richard Barnes (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Richard Barnes (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Shane Amante (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Shane Amante (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)