nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: Alex Band <alexb () ripe net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:23:29 +0200
On 29 May 2012, at 16:21, David Conrad wrote:
On May 29, 2012, at 4:02 AM, paul vixie wrote:i can tell more than that. rover is a system that only works at all when everything everywhere is working well, and when changes always come in perfect time-order,Exactly like DNSSEC.no. dnssec for a response only needs that response's delegation and signing path to work, not "everything everywhere".My impression was that ROVER does not need "everything, everywhere" to work to fetch the routing information for a particular prefix -- it merely needs sufficient routing information to follow the delegation and signing path for the prefix it is looking up. However, I'll admit I haven't looked into this in any particular depth so I'm probably wrong.
RPKI needs the full data set to determine if a BGP prefix has the status 'valid', 'invalid' or 'unknown'. It can't work with partial data. For example, if you are the holder of 10.0.0.0/16 and you originate the full aggregate from AS123 and a more specific such as 10.0.1.0/24 from AS456, then you will need a ROA for both to make them both 'valid'. If you only authorize 10.0.0.0/16 with AS123, then the announcement from AS456 will be 'invalid'. If you only authorize 10.0.1.0/24 from AS456, the announcement from AS123 will remain 'unknown'. So in RPKI, partial data – so you failed to fetch one of the ROAs in the set – can make something 'invalid' or 'unknown' that should actually be 'valid'. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6483#page-3 As far as I know, ROVER doesn't work like that. You can make a positive statement about a Prefix+AS combination, but that doesn't mark the origination from another AS 'unauthorized' or 'invalid', there merely isn't a statement for it. (Someone please confirm. I may be wrong.) -Alex
Current thread:
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns?, (continued)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (May 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? paul vixie (May 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? paul vixie (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Richard Barnes (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Richard Barnes (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Shane Amante (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Shane Amante (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (May 29)