nanog mailing list archives

Re: rpki vs. secure dns?


From: John Kristoff <jtk () cymru com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 10:31:11 -0500

On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:46:06 -0400
Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

We need more flexible, distributed architecture behind - no matter -
which interests will be lobbied as we have got already.

as i agree that there is a problem, i *very* eagerly await your
proposal

As Radia says in her book, we're probably stuck with BGP forever, but I
frequently wonder if she is right in suggesting we could have done
better by having a link state protocol instead.  It trades some set of
problems for another, but I don't find the dread this might instill
reason enough to avoid putting some research effort into it.

John


Current thread: